What
a marvelously retold story of Anna Leonowens and her adventure in Siam! We
watched in awe and excitement, our hearts melting to the authentic
portrayal of love blooming between two powerful people who are not
destined to be together. Jodie Foster as Anna and Chow Yun-Fat as the King
unraveled the beauty and mystery of cultural and gender differences in a
way that left us in open mouthed wonder.
Most people are familiar with the story of Anna
Leonowens. A widowed teacher of English descent stationed in India, Anna
is summoned to Siam (now Thailand) to become the tutor to the son and heir
apparent of the King of Siam. As an interesting parallel, the story is set
during the Unites States Civil War and the Lincoln Presidential
administration and the publishing of Uncle Tom’s Cabin and its
opposition to slavery. Siam is a closed nation with strict social caste
rigidity and dependence on slavery under the iron hand of Monarchy. The
King, though, knows that change must be integrated and wants his son
educated in the ways of England and the West.
As a headstrong and clever woman accustomed to a certain
professional decorum and the honoring of employment contracts, Anna
quickly enters into a struggle for independence and recognition in a male
dominated world, a need that becomes even more challenged in Siam’s
royal palace where women have virtually no status outside of the family
role. Anna defies all of the royal protocols for relating to the King. In
fact, she is the only person, not to mention a woman, who dares to stand
in the King’s presence and to stand up to him verbally through direct
opposition and unsolicited opinions.
The conflict between a powerful man and a powerful woman
has always been at the heart of great love stories, especially when the
woman is the one challenging the man’s authority and superiority. In
Anna’s case, significant cultural difference must be overcome as well,
but she ultimately claims her place as the King’s equal. Anna, for all
her power is really rather prim and has not filled the place in her heart
or erotic life left empty by the recent death of her husband.
Outside of the class, gender, and cultural boundaries
which constrict them, both Anna and the King seek perfection of their
beings. In a frantically changing world, many limits can be imposed on
self-actualization, but Anna refuses to take No for an answer whether she
is attempting to free a slave, treating a prince like any other student,
or speaking her mind in public and private. She knows the ideals of being
a better human being, and she strives to achieve them. This is a quality
that opens the King’s heart and soul to her because despite his God-like
stature, fairness, and compassion, he is in many ways bound by the rigid
customs. That is all he knows, and Anna opens the doors through which he
can see a more complete way of being a man as well as the ruler.
Although Anna has much with which to challenge the King,
he challenges her as well. In a touching and intimate confrontation, the
King makes Anna face the most important question: "What does it mean
to be truly a woman, and not just a widow, a mother, and a teacher?"
This indeed is the question women are still struggling
to answer. More than anything, Anna and the King creates a
wonderful arena where a woman and a man stand in their power with open
hearts that sense, know, and love each other in their strength as well as
in their weakness.
The romantic subtext between these two people is so
strong and so wonderfully expressed by Foster and Yun-Fat that they rarely
speak their feelings. And we are happy they don’t because the love
between Anna and the King is expressed more deeply through their gestures,
glances, and action than words could ever tell. In fact, the art of dance
as a means of bonding between a man and woman who cannot or will not
otherwise intertwine is wonderfully used in the film.
One of the harder lessons for those who live in a world
of greater acceptance of sexual and romantic license of our modern ways is
that we cannot always have what we want and at the same time have the
integrity to fulfill our destinies. In reality, many of us are still best
fulfilled in a monogamous coupling that gives us a meeting of spirits as
well as bodies. Anna could never have the exclusive enjoyment of the King’s
body (he had many wives and concubines and that was not going to change),
and her desire was too strong to be with him incompletely. In one
breathtaking moment, she refuses a lavish gift because of the strings that
might be attached. In the end, she ultimately leaves the King. That
decision is heroic and for it, Anna is more realized, the King is more
open, and the heir apparent learns about grace and a new level of
enlightenment that make him a better monarch. Sometimes, we must decline
the favor of a much wanted and available lover for higher principles. This
movie powerfully shows the full price and glory of such a decision in the
context of real lives. This gives the lesson a richness and preciousness
that can never be achieved by dogmatic "thou shalts" and
"thou shalt nots".
And of course, Anna and the King is not only a
love story, but also a story of a family, a society, and the role of
justice and government. It is also the story of the pain caused by change.
The King’s kids, all 50 plus of them are a fetching, loving lot. The
death of one is a terrible loss that almost breaks apart the bonds that
hold them all together. Even the many wives and concubines have their part
in unraveling this beautiful story. There are moments of pageantry and
military exploit, but ultimately this is a story of the heart and soul,
and a grand one at that.
In short, Anna and the King is an amazing film,
and the power of the heart it makes alive cuts like a hot knife through
the butter of seemingly irreconcilable differences.