Let
us be frank. To fully appreciate Titus, we had to read
Shakespeare’s original play Titus Andronicus, so if you haven’t
recently savored Shakespeare’s work and are unfamiliar with his
poetic language and old English vocabulary, you might find this
adaptation disengaging. On the other hand, even though it can’t quite
stand on its own, the movie is a superbly acted effort to immortalize
Shakespeare’s early play on the big screen.
The story begins in the Andronicus family crypt where Titus (Anthony
Hopkins), a
long-time leading Roman general, is burying sons he lost in the war with
Goths. In a vengeful sacrifice, he orders the torture and killing of the son of his prized prisoner,
Tamora (Jessica Lange), the queen of Goths. Titus is offered the title of Roman emperor,
but he eagerly surrenders it to Saturninus (Alan Cumming). Saturninus asks for the hand
of Titus’s daughter Lavinia (Laura Fraser) who is wisked away by her fiancé
Bassianus (James Frain), Saturninus’s brother. Lavinia’s brothers know of her
engagement to Bassianus, and support Lavinia’s refusal to marry the
emperor. Titus, however, feels dishonored that his children would defy
his command for her to marry. In his outrage, Titus kills one of his sons.
Saturninus then quickly turns the tables and proposes to Tamora and makes
her the empresses. She vows to destroy Titus and his entire family as
revenge for her son’s merciless sacrifice. And thus, the story
unravels as Tamora and Titus vie for power, revenge, and control of the minds
and spirits of those around them.
In trying to make the play more appealing to our time, and perhaps to
save money on expensive period setting and wardrobe, the film weaves in
and out of modern scenes of car filled streets, extras dressed in black
suits and hats, villains unleashing their obsessions to rock music in
front of rows of computer gaming machines. This could be seen as an
attempt to use Shakespeare’s Titus as a commentary to the
degradation in contemporary culture, or perhaps to illustrate the
immortality of the bard’s genius. We even thought this might be a tip
of the hat to the Bard’s tendency to interject then current conditions
onto the Roman world of the play’s settings. Just as he made the
common parlance of Roman stories relevant to his Elizabethan world,
perhaps the story creators of the movie wanted to make the movie more
accessible to our times.
Regardless, Titus seems more focused on the flaky modern
overlay and graphic depiction of violence than with the attempt of the
play to shed light on the corruption of government and the personal
abuse of power to kill. Because graphic violence is difficult to show on
stage, Shakespeare describes its impact through verse that the
characters speak in response to what happens. In the screen version, the
violence is graphic to the point of becoming absurd, and instead of
being drawn within to reflect on the nature of humanity and questions at
hand, we are shocked away from the subtler meanings.
Titus has served Rome all of his life. He shed blood and lost sons in
numerous wars. He is proud to kill for Rome, and the pain of his
personal loss in this service is relieved through a gruesome sacrifice
of Tamora’s son. Maybe, the best of men would muster compassion and
show mercy to the enemy whose defeat is definite, but Titus is an
instrument of his government, one that is depicted as a den of blood
sucking manipulators, torturers, and murders who thrive on the sweat and
honor of its loyal citizens, and then turn a merciless cheek. For acting
heartlessly out of devotion to Rome, Titus pays the price, but the
empire is the ultimate villain here, and those who rose to power by
exploiting Titus’s loyalty must be brought down through their own
treacherous means.
Hopefully, the depths of humanity that Shakespeare so poignantly
exposes will help you to appreciate Titus. We’d love to know
how you reacted to this film.